All categories

2 years ago

Which one is greater 10.05 or 10.005

Mathematics

1 answer:

Blababa [14]2 years ago

8 0

10.05 = 10 5/100 = 10 1/20
10.005 = 10 5/1000 = 10 1/200

therefore, 10.05 is greater then 10.005

You might be interested in

Please don't answer just for points!! this is for my semester grade!!!

julsineya [31]

Answer:

x=11 and the number of solutions is one solution

Step-by-step explanation:

The square root of 121 is 11. There are no other solutions, I believe.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Need help pls .......

sukhopar [10]

Answer:

It should be the last one because rigid transformations doesn't change in size just where it is

7 0

2 years ago

Josie and her brothers and sisters measured their heights and found the mean averageThe mean was 150cmJosie forgot her height. C

Andrei [34K]

Answer:

135 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Jose's height = x

The mean of their heights = 150

Given the Heights:

150cm, 170cm, 140cm, 155cm

The mean is the sum if the heights divided by the number of people

Here :

(150 + 170 + 140 + 155 + x) / 5 = 150

(615 + x) / 5 = 150

615 + x = 750

x = 750 - 615

x = 135 cm

8 0

2 years ago

When diving, a bald eagle can reach a speed of 200 miles per hour. What is this speed in feet per second? Round to the nearest h

LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

A mile is equal to 5280 feet

You start off with

200 miles per hour

If you multiply 200 by 5280 you can find the speed in feet per hour

1,056,000 feet per hour

There are 60 minutes in an hour

If you divide 1,056,000 by 60 you can find the speed in feet per minute

So 17,600 feet per minute

Then if you divide that by 60 you can find the speed in feet per seconds

It is 293 1/3 or 293.333 feet per second.

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

"assume that s is a non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded above and lambda is the least upper bound. Prove that for all

s2008m [1.1K]

By definition, if $\lambda$ is the least upper bound of the set $S$ , it means two thing:

$\forall x \in S,\ x \leq \lambda$
$\forall \varepsilon>0,\ \exists x \in S:\ x>\lambda-\varepsilon$

In other words, the least upper bound of a set is greater than or equal to every single element of the set, but it is "close enough" to the elements of the set, because you guaranteed to find elements in the set between $\lambda-\varepsilon$ and $\lambda$

For example, pick $S = [1,10)$ . Obvisouly, the least upper bound is $\lambda = 10$ . In fact, every number in $[1,10)$ is smaller than 10, but as soon as you take away something from 10, say 0.01, you get 9.99, and there are elements in $S$ greater than 9.99, say 9.9999.

So, the claim is basically proven by definition: if $\beta < \lambda$ , let $0 < \delta = \lambda - \beta$ . By definition, there exists $\alpha \in S:\ \alpha > \lambda - \delta$ .

8 0

2 years ago