The inverse would make the inputs the outputs (switching the x's and y's) because plugging in 4 into the inverse would somehow output 4 and 5, the inverse could not exist. plug in the inverse points to see that the vertical line test would fail.
The best estimate for this correlation would be B) 0.9.
We can see that the number is constantly going up, which would throw out the D answer.
We can also see that for every time the x goes up 1, the y goes up a little less than one. We can see that in the ordered pairs that exist on the graph such as (3, 2), (8, 6) and (2.1, 1.9).
Since the y values are just lower than the x, the correlation would be just under one. Therefore, 0.9 is an accurate estimation.
B.offer another idea hope i helped :)
This is the formula for the surface area of a cylinder including the ends, like the total surface area of a can of peas.
S = 2·π·r² + 2·π·r · H
Divide each side by 2·π·r :
S/2·π·r = r + H
Subtract r from each side :
H = (S/2·π·r) - r
or
H = (S - 2·π·r²) / (2·π·r)
