Mark: 52 meatball sandwiches
Julie: 64 meatball sandwiches
This question includes some misspelled words; here is the correct question:
Which point of view is most likely to be unreliable in a story?
All points of view in a story are equally reliable.
The first person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
All points of view in a story are equally unreliable.
The third-person point of view is most likely to be unreliable.
The correct answer is The first-person narrator is most likely to be unreliable.
Explanation:
In a narrative text, an unreliable narrator implies the narrator lies on purpose to the reader, or his/her version of the story is not completely accurate. This feature of narration occurs mainly if the story, novel, etc. includes a first-person narrator. This is because in a first-person narrator, the thoughts, feelings, and point of view of one of the characters prevail, and this causes the events told are subjective and therefore more likely to be inaccurate. Also, this does not occur if there is a third-person narrator because in this case the narrator acts as an observer and this makes it more objective.
-2(2b-3)
Multiply the bracket by -2
Whenever multiplying a -negative number with a -negative number= + positive number.
(-2)(2b)(-2)(-3)
-4b+6
Answer: -4b+6
Answer:
10 seconds
Step-by-step explanation:
Every second the bug travels 0.5m/s or 0.5 meters per second.
Given that, every 2 seconds the bug will travel a full 1 meter.
To solve this one can simply divide 5m by 0.5 and get 10 seconds.
Answer:
ok i think its D
Step-by-step explanation:
2,4; x= 3
i am not 100% but like i looked up examples and that seems to be the only one that looks right