Answer:
B) Defeated.
Explanation:
In the poem <em>Wichita Mourning</em> by David Matherne, the speaker tells about Sally Richards and her father Reverent Richards who are sad about losing their church to another corporate company. The whole yet short poem deals with the loss of this loss, where the church is bought by someone to be used for an altogether different purpose. It shows the grief that the father-daughter duo are feeling.
In line 9, the poet used the word <em>"broken"</em> to present the inner state of the girl, who is observing all the church possessions being moved out. Though the dictionary defines broken as something that is shattered, dashed to pieces or brought to pieces, the broken in this regard presents the defeated state of the duo in their loss of their home and church.
We can actually see that the positions of power and influence that one thinks would benefit from the inclusion of diverse members are:
- Police and public safety officers
- Members of Congress and the legislature
- Judges and justices.
<h3>What is position of power?</h3>
Position of power actually refers to the place one is given to govern and wield control over others. Position of power also refers to one's authority over others.
We see that the selected group of position of power will actually benefit from the inclusion of diverse members.
Learn more about position of power on brainly.com/question/13090327
#SPJ1
Answer:
1) This passage does not contain an argument. It begins with a comment that everyone knows the U.S. is having an election (in 2008); the author proceeds to state three things that he thinks Europe should focus on. He does not offer reasons for his statement that these three things are jobs, Muslims, and neighbors.
2) This passage contains both an argument and a sub-argument. 1.The butler was passionately in love with the victim. Thus, 2. It was not the butler who committed the murder. 3. Either the butler committed the murder or the judge committed the murder. Therefore, 4. The judge committed the murder. The sub-argument goes from (1) to (2), and the main argument goes from (2) and (3) to (4). Note again: identifying the structure does not imply saying that this is a good argument.
3) This passage contains an argument. Standardization: (1) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish can know whether that other person deserves punishment. (2) No one who cannot know whether another person deserves punishment has a right to punish that person. Therefore, (3) No one who uses a relatively unreliable procedure in order to decide whether to punish another person has a right to punish that person.
Answer:
“If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates.”
Explanation:
Active, vibrant, and ethusiastic would be 3 words.
