V = lhr
V ÷ lh = lhr ÷ lh
V/lh = r
r = V/lh
Just divide both sides by what you want removed, leaving behind r.
Answer:
y=1.003009+0.003453x
or
GPA=1.003009+0.003453(SAT Score)
Step-by-step explanation:
The least square regression equation can be written as
y=a+bx
In the given scenario y is the GPA and x is SAT score because GPA depends on SAT score.
SAT score (X) GPA (Y) X² XY
421 2.93 177241 1233.53
375 2.87 140625 1076.25
585 3.03 342225 1772.55
693 3.42 480249 2370.06
608 3.66 369664 2225.28
392 2.91 153664 1140.72
418 2.12 174724 886.16
484 2.5 234256 1210
725 3.24 525625 2349
506 1.97 256036 996.82
613 2.73 375769 1673.49
706 3.88 498436 2739.28
366 1.58 133956 578.28
sumx=6892
sumy=36.84
sumx²=3862470
sumxy=20251.42
n=13
b=9367.18/2712446
b=0.003453
a=ybar-b(xbar)
ybar=sum(y)/n
ybar=2.833846
xbar=sum(x)/n
xbar=530.1538
a=2.833846-0.003453*(530.1538)
a=1.003009
Thus, required regression equation is
y=1.003009+0.003453x.
The least-squares regression equation that shows the best relationship between GPA and the SAT score is
GPA=1.003009+0.003453(SAT Score)
Answer:
16.25% was spent on food
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one
given data
A family spends $520 every month on food
The family's income is $3200 Monthly
Required
We want to find the percentage of the income spent on food only
Step two
percentage spent on food= amount spent on food/income*100
percentage spent on food= 520/3200*100
percentage spent on food= 0.1625*100
percentage spent on food= 16.25%
=16.25%
Answer:
x= -9
Step-by-step explanation:
7(x+2)=-49
divide both sides by 7
(x+2)=-7
subtract 2 from both dies
x= -9
Answer:
(assuming this isn't actually for math?) but one reason is bc science shouldn't be always taken as fact. science can be wrong.
Explanation:
not all but many scientists are skeptical and won't accept anything without proof, and even when things are accepted as right they can still be wrong later. example: humans once believed the planets revolved around the earth and that the earth was flat (even, some people still believe the earth is flat today....) but both those things are generally unaccepted today.
science shouldn't be viewed as fact always, because accepting everything as fact will lead to misassumptions and false information. it's like we should never take things for granted