A. Their own, their own
Is the answer
The entry for this transaction would be this:
Land 1,827,000
Ordinary shares 1,827,000
#
<span>The market value of the shares on </span>this transaction<span> does not affect the recording of this transaction. If the share has no par value, the stated value should be used. Stated value is a value assigned by the company to its stock for the purpose of accounting and it does not have any relation with the market value of the shares. Since stated value is not given in this problem, we should record the entire amount of the land exchanged in this transaction to the "Ordinary shares" account.</span>
Answer:
Macmillana's GDP is less sensitive economic fluctuations than Bloedelo's GDP. Two reasons account for this:
1) The keynesian multiplier is smaller.
The keynesian multiplier tells us about the sensitivity of GDP to increases in domestic expenditure (consumption, investment or government purchases). If the keynesian multiplier is small, then, GDP will be less sensitive to fluctuations in aggregate expenditure.
2) Macmillana's economy has implemented automatic stabilizers, while Bloedelo's economy has not.
Automatic Stabilizers are government policies meant to reduce fluctuations in GDP. The two most common automatic stabilizers are: income taxes and unemployment benefits.
Automatic Stabilizers reduce the kenyensian multiplier, dampening Macmillana's GDP sensitivity to fluctuations even more.
The given statement that most riders cannot tell the difference between low-risk behavior and high-risk behavior is FALSE.
<h3>What is
high-risk behavior.?</h3>
This refers to the type of behavior that a person engages in that could lead to severe consequences.
Hence, we can see that The given statement that most riders cannot tell the difference between low-risk behavior and high-risk behavior is FALSE and this is because they know when they put themselves in danger and when they are following protocols and guidelines about safety.
Read more about high-risk behavior here:
brainly.com/question/3711204
#SPJ1
Heidi's personal assets will be protected in the event that the corporation fails, although she could lose her entire investment.
Answer: Option D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the corporation of retail card and the gift shop that was started by Heidi, she is the primary stock holder of that particular corporation. She would be the whole sole owner of the profit of the corporation that it would earn.
But in case if it fails and there are losses in the corporation, then to cover the losses, the assets which belong to Heidi will not be included to cover the losses of the corporation. Her investment in this case would be gone but not her personal assets.