<span>
</span>
Entered according to act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred
and fifty-three, by
DERBY AND MILLER,
In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Northern District of New-York.
ENTERED IN LONDON AT STATIONERS' HALL.
<span>TO
HARRIET BEECHER STOWE:WHOSE NAME,
THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, IS IDENTIFIED WITH THE
GREAT REFORM:
THIS NARRATIVE, AFFORDING ANOTHER
Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin,
IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED
</span>
"Such dupes are men to custom, and so prone
To reverence what is ancient, and can plead
A course of long observance for its use,
That even servitude, the worst of ills,
Because delivered down from sire to son,
Is kept and guarded as a sacred thing.
But is it fit or can it bear the shock
Of rational discussion, that a man
Compounded and made up, like other men,
Of elements tumultuous, in whom lust
And folly in as ample measure meet,
As in the bosom of the slave he rules,
Should be a despot absolute, and boast
Himself the only freeman of his land?"
Answer:
Explanation:
Hamilton, although he had expressed substantially the same view in The Federalist regarding the power of reception, adopted a very different conception of it in defense of Washington’s proclamation. Writing under the pseudonym, “Pacificus,” he said: “The right of the executive to receive ambassadors and other public ministers, may serve to illustrate the relative duties of the executive and legislative departments. This right includes that of judging, in the case of a revolution of government in a foreign country, whether the new rulers are competent organs of the national will, and ought to be recognized, or not; which, where a treaty antecedently exists between the United States and such nation, involves the power of continuing or suspending its operation. For until the new government is acknowledged, the treaties between the nations, so far at least as regards public rights, are of course suspended. This power of determining virtually upon the operation of national treaties, as a consequence of the power to receive public ministers, is an important instance of the right of the executive, to decide upon the obligations of the country with regard to foreign nations. To apply it to the case of France, if there had been a treaty of alliance, offensive and defensive, between the United States and that country, the unqualified acknowledgment of the new government would have put the United States in a condition to become as an associate in the war with France, and would have laid the legislature under an obligation, if required, and there was otherwise no valid excuse, of exercising its power of declaring war. This serves as an example of the right of the executive, in certain cases, to determine the condition of the nation, though it may, in its consequences, affect the exercise of the power of the legislature to declare war. Nevertheless, the executive cannot thereby control the exercise of that power. The legislature is still free to perform its duties, according to its own sense of them; though the executive, in the exercise of its constitutional powers, may establish an antecedent state of things, which ought to weigh in the legislative decision. The division of the executive power in the Constitution, creates a concurrent authority in the cases to which it relates.
Answer:
Explanation:
2.The Cold War rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union lasted for ... Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American ... was “a political force committed fanatically to the belief that with the U.S. there can be ... the country use military force to contain communist expansionism anywhere it ...
1.The Butter Battle Book is an allegory for the nuclear arms race and the state of mutually assured destruction (MAD) that occurred during the Cold War. This story thus lends itself to a discussion with children about the concept of war itself, the moral issues related to war, and the outcomes of retaliatory acts.
<u>A persuasive speech</u>.
A persuasive speech is defined as <em>a specific type of speech in which the speaker has a goal of convincing the audience to accept his or her point of view</em><em>. </em>Since what you're looking for is to <u>convince</u> your audience not to drop out of school, then this speech would be the most appropiate.
Definitely not an extemporaneous speech as this is carried out or performed with little or no preparation and that would not push your audience to want to stay in school. Not an entertaining speech because entertaining an audience is not the same as convincing them.
Therefore, you should go with a persuasive speech.
Answer:
The central idea is to show how the foods offered in American supermarkets are very convenient, but unhealthy and attractive.
Explanation:
According to the article, we can see that as we age and understand more about healthy foods, the foods offered by supermarkets become less interesting. That's because, as adults, we look for the ease and practicality of frozen, extremely processed foods, fast food, among others. These foods do not propose a safe diet and can be very harmful, however, when an individual opts for healthier foods, he finds it difficult to find them in supermarkets.