Answer: The court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, we should note that the court will apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether the predominant purpose of the contract was the sale of goods in which case the UCC would apply.
We should note that under a predominant purpose test, it will apply when the transaction involved is Mena for goods sales and not for the service sales.
Answer:
E) if the firm evaluates these projects and all other projects at the new overall corporate wacc, it will probably become riskier over time.
Explanation:
Before the merger, Audaco would have rejected any project with an IRR of less than 12% (more risky investments) while Careco only required a 10% IRR (less risky projects). But after the merger the combined WACC will be lower than Audaco's, but higher than Careco's. Therefore, the new merged company will start accepting more risky projects and that tendency will continue over time. Eventually, the company's WACC will have to adjust and increase, and the cycle will continue.
Well, if people are discriminated against and feel they are not equal to some other classes in their own society, they obviously will not be happy which will have an impact on their jobs and careers. If they are not happy, they will not give their full potential at their jobs, which will ultimately lead to less and less income for the company.
That's what I think, at least. :)
Answer:
c. $480,000
Explanation:
Cost of goods manufactured $
Direct materials used 120,000
Direct labor 200,000
Manufacturing overhead 150,000
Beginning work in process 20,000
Ending work in process <u> 10,000 </u>
Cost of goods manufactured <u> 480,000 </u>
So, Correct option is c. $480,000
