Answer:
The answer is: E) None of his salary can be excluded from gross income because Hank must reside overseas for the entire year
Explanation:
According to the IRS's Foreign Earned Income Exclusion (and Requirements) a US citizen can claim up to $105,900 (in 2019) of his gross income to be excluded from gross income in the US only if that person resided in the foreign country for at least 330 days in the last year.
My mission in life is to be a person for others. I want to share my talents and skills to other people. Aside from this, I want to extend my help especially to those in need. Everyday in my life, I would like to give positively impact to each person I meet.
Someday, I aspire to become a lawyer in which I believe is a great and respectable profession. I want to provide high quality legal services. I want to be known as someone who is innovative and excellent in creating legal solutions. By doing so, this will give fulfillment in my career and pride to my family.
Answer:
The person with Absolute advantage is the one that produces more of a good than the other.
<em><u>Dina </u></em><em>has an absolute advantage in the production of alfalfa, and </em><em><u>Charles</u></em><em> has an absolute advantage in the production of barley. </em>
The person with Comparative Advantage is the person who produces something at a lower opportunity cost.
Charles Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 12 bushels per acre instead of 6 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 6/12 = 0.5 bushels Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 12/6 = 2 bushels Alfalfa is given up.
Dina Opportunity Costs
Producing Alfalfa gives 15 bushels per acre instead of 5 bushels for Barley.
Producing 1 Alfalfa means 5/15 = 0.33 bushels of Barley is given up
Producing 1 bushel of Barley means 15/5 = 3 bushels of Alfalfa is given up.
<em>Charles's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>2</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa, whereas Dina's opportunity cost of producing 1 bushel of barley is </em><em><u>3</u></em><em> bushels of alfalfa. Because Charles has </em><em><u>lower</u></em><em> a opportunity cost of producing barley than Dina, </em><em><u>Charlie</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of barley, and </em><em><u>Dina</u></em><em> has a comparative advantage in the production of alfalfa.</em>
Answer:
a. Does this qualify as a good Section 351 transaction?
Answer: No. This is because service is not a qualified property contribution under the section 321. Moreover, fair value of stock received by Chrissie is just 75% of 100%.
b. What gain does Chrissie Recognize?
Answer: The Gain Chrissie recognizes = FMV of stock received - Adjusted basis of transferred property = $750,000 - $500,000 = $250,000.
c. What gain does Mirinda recognize?
Answer: The Gain Mirinda recognizes is $0 or Mirinda will recognizes compensation worth which will be taxed as an ordinary Income ($250,000).
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
The large corporations be more likely to support development of sustaining technology rather than emerging technology is because the <span> technology is already aligned with main revenue streams.
</span>
The answer is C.
