Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation:
Charge an official with wrongdoing I’m pretty sure
<span>Chapter 4 is very important to Helen Keller’s life. It explains when her teacher was first teaching her how to communicate. Without her teacher Helen probably would not have been able to communicate well or tell people what she wanted. It also demonstrated the way her teacher taught and how Helen reacted. I think that in this chapter Helen learned a little responsibly and learned from her actions. I think that it will make it easier for her because the teacher is helping her learn in ways that no one not even her family and friends could. I think that the teaching will also help her conquer great things in other parts of the book as well because she can be taught she just has to focus. Maybe she will get even closer to her family because of what happened. She learned in this chapter how to match words with what they were. I think this will also help her later in the book. One thing that stuck with me is after learning how to spell doll in the palm of her hand she went to show her mother. This shows that she probably had a good relationship with her mom and she cared what she thought about her. This chapter also showed that people underestimated Helen’s ability’s to learn and communicate with others. I do not think that this will be the most important chapter of the book because so many other great things could happen to her throughout the book. It might very well be the most important but I’m just not quite sure about that. I do have to say this may be one of the most important parts. I do think that the most important chapter will be coming along in the book soon because what happened in this one.</span>
<span>A. He outlines a clear purpose in the speech. Faulkner is known for his "stream-of-consciousness" technique. This technique involves the author writing as if he is the character, rather than writing what the character is doing from an outside point of view. His style was straight forward and enabled the reader to visualize his passages.</span>
Example:
One day, a boy walked to his friend’s house.
Which substitution in diction would best improve the setting in the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence?
replace “day” with “warm afternoon”
Replace “a boy” with “Cameron”
Replace “walked” with “drove”
Replace “house” with “school”
Answer: Replace “a boy” with “Cameron”