Answer:
Yes they are sustainable
Explanation:
The strategies mentioned in the question were laid out my Michael Porter and therefore, we can look analyse his model to understand whether these strategies are sustainable or not.
Porter has categorized strategies into 3 broad categories: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, and Focus strategies (all three are known as "Generic Strategies). Focus strategy is branched out into two sub-segments known as Cost Focus and Differentiation Focus.
Now, the question has already clarified that the strategies in question are both focus strategies. So lets understand what each entails.
Differentiation Focus: A strategy in which the company aims to gain market leadership in a focused market (a specific market) through strategic differentiaion. This strategic differentiaion involves offering a specialized service or a unique product in a niche market. Cost focus strategy is similar in the sense is that that the aim is to offer highly low cost products/services to a niche market. Because of the focus on these niche markets, company's develop a strong understansing of the consumer thereby developing strong brand loyalty with that particular customer base. The key ingredient, again, is that the competitive advantage is being harnessed by focusing just on a particular niche market. Another key component is that the companies using this strategy rely on the consumers in the target market having different needs, tastes, and requirements than consumers in other segments in the industry.
Now, these strategies by desig were put forth my Porter has being sustainable. Hence the term "generic strategies" in that they can be broadly used to create and sustain performance. The focus strategies as defined above are sustainable since they harness the power of having priority knowledge of their target market to provide appropriate services and products. The high brand loyalty and knowledge of consumers give them an edge over competitors (competitive rivalry). Supplier power depends on the nature of products being offered therefore it cant be taken into consideration. Buyer power can be managed since you are prodiving unique service offerings to unique customers. Threat of substitution depends on the product and service offering. Threat of new entry by larger player exists, but due to the focus that the company had in the target market, barriers to entry (long strong brand loyalty) can be developed.
<span>There are a couple of reasons why Bryan acted in an unethical manner. First, he may have low morals which could be traced to his upbringing or life challenges. He could also have acted this way due to the demands made upon him by his employer to increase sales so dramatically. The stress of keeping his job may have been greater than acting ethically.</span>
Answer:
Thee jounal entry for January 1 of Messing Company is done below.
Explanation:
3.5% * 4000 = 140
Date Account Titles Dr Cr
Jan 1 Cash $3,860
Credit Card Expense 140
Sales Revenue 4,000
Answer:
23.39%
Explanation:
From the given information, the amount was raised in rubies, Hence, we will convert them to dollars to be able to pay back the needed obligations.
However, according to the exchange rates, the IRR of dollar cash flow is the actual cost of financing that the company will address.
By applying the EXCEL FORMULA to compute the actual cost of financing, we get;
A B C D E
Coupon 17%
Year 0 1 2 3
Cashflow in
rubles 5,000,000 5000000*17% 5000000*17% 5000000+850
= 850000 = 850000 000
= 5850000
Exchange $0.30 $0.032 $0.034 $0.035
rate
(per rubles) 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000
Cash flow × 0.03 × 0.032 × 0.034 × 0.035
in dollars = $150000.00 27200.00 28900.00 204750.00
IRR 23.39%
Answer: judgemental appraisal method.
Explanation: judgemental appraisal method is a form of performance appraisal—a systematic, general and periodic process that assesses an job performance and productivity of employees in comparison to certain pre-established criteria and organizational objectives. The judgmental appraisal method is applied when assessing individual employee's job performance and productivity in areas that are difficult to measure. Vast majority of information gathered and delivered using this technique is subjective though there may be some parts that are objective.
By requesting that each subordinate be rated (performance evaluation) according to how closely the appraisal (pre-determined criteria) describes the employee, the company new form is an example of a judgmental appraisal method.
