I believe the correct answer is C. it makes a point without directly stating it.
Satire is often used by authors who want to criticize something or someone without having to explicitly do that - they use metaphors in order to mock them without them realizing that they have been exposed to such ridicule. Boyle is trying to mock the government in his work by comparing its members to animals, which he does in order to conceal his true intentions.
The answers to the prompts have been provided thus:
- Peter Dawson went to the stadium the day of the finals to offer encouragement to the competitors.
- Peter Dawson might have felt bad but not daunted or bitter about not being allowed to compete.
<h3>How to decode the meaning of a text</h3>
When given a text to read and understand the meanings implied, it is important to go beyond what is written. You need to understand the tone of that text through the language used.
This will help you to make meaning of the text and answer the prompts correctly.
Learn more about narrative texts here:
brainly.com/question/19990924
The restore Bourbon dynasty under Louis XVII(1814, 1815-24)<span> and Charles X who ruled from 1824 until he abdicate during the July Revolution.</span>
Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation: