The two primary opportunities in safe for driving relentless improvement are option A. Iteration Retrospective and option D. Inspect and Adapt workshop. Hence, the correct answers are options A. and D.; Iteration Retrospective and Inspect and Adapt workshop respectively. Read below about Iteration Retrospective.
<h3>What is Iteration Retrospective?</h3>
The Iteration Retrospective is a usual event where Agile Team members debate the results of the Iteration, review their practices, and identify ways to improve. At the end of each iteration, Agile teams that make use of ScrumXP gather for an iteration retrospective.
Therefore, the correct answers are as given above.
learn more about Iteration Retrospective:
brainly.com/question/18646796
#SPJ1
The complete question goes thus:
What are two SAFe primary opportunities for driving relentless improvement? (Choose two)
a) Iteration Retrospective
b) Daily Stand-up
c) Program Backlog Refinement
c) PI Planning
d) Inspect and Adapt workshop
If the whole lecture about mitochondria was placed in a single tweet, it would be this one:
<span>“The mitochondria is the power house of the cell” A powerhouse that we all should be mindful about and to take care of our own.</span>
B because it the right answer there
Answer:
Explanation:
I think it's A.
You should always question the source. You might be lucky and discover what they've not said about their product. Or you may discover it is simply not true.
A few years back (many in fact), there was a product on the market call Laetrile. It was produced from peach pits. It has an overwhelming popularity that Sloan Kettering (the Cancer Clinic in New York -- the oldest and largest one in the world), spent some of their needed grant money to test Laetrile. The results -- nothing. Imagine what happened to those who marketed this product. Word got around. People with Cancer are pretty desperate. They and their loved ones will try anything.
But the facts on the internet help to dispel this kind of thing.
Answer:
The most probable result is that the court will declare the contract invalid and non-binding because the purchase price and important terms regarding the consideration involve are too vague and indefinite.
In order for a contract to be considered valid and binding, consideration must exist and the more precise the terms, the better. Consideration is something of value that both parties exchange. In this case it is a house vs. money, but the price is not specified.