Options a to c can be the reasons for scientific models.
But to primarily answer scientific questions,that would require an empirical and experimental approach and not use of models.
Though after getting the answers, models can be built to further explain the answers.
<span>d. answer scientific questions.</span>
The amplitude of a wave tells us about the intensity or brightness of the light relative to other light waves of the same wavelength.
We don't know that at all. The 3rd law says that the REaction is opposite and EQUAL to the action. We don't know where that "twice as much" comes from.
Answer:
Explanation: The field of a magnet is strongest at either pole of the magnet. it's equally strong at the North Pole when put next with the South Pole. The force is weaker within the middle of the magnet and halfway between the pole and also the center.
The molecules which evaporate presumably take heat away from the liquid. So, I'd disagree with the classmate. Whether the amount of cooling would differ from the usual case wherein the molecules have different speeds is another question.
I guess the argument goes something along the lines of that the faster moving and therefore most kinetically energetic molecues evaporate and take away most heat. But if there's no faster moving molecules, 'cos they all have the same speed well, then presumably they'd all take away the same amount of heat. So, maybe the cooling would be less. No cooling though ??? Hmmmm dunno .... i think not ....