Answer:
3 in wide by 4.5 in long.
Step-by-step explanation:
3/4=0.75
I divided the given dimensions by two, so I could multiply .75 by the sets of twos instead of dividing 3/4 by two and multiplying that by 12 and 8.
.74 x 4 = 3
.75 x 6 = 4.5
Example 1:
The pros of Orthographic is that they can show hidden details and all of the connecting parts, they can be annotated to display material and finishes. The pros of Isometric projection is that they dont need many views and it gives accuracy, cons are is created a unorginized apperance by the lack of foreshortening, I would choose Isometric projection because it shows the size of the figure.
Example 2:
Orthographic projection is a good option for showing lots of detail and small things. The limitation is that with all of that detail, they can become quite messy and hard to understand to someone new to them. However, that is one of the pros of Isometric projection. It gives easy detail and is just as good as an Orthographic. Personally, I find Isometric projections easier to interpret.
Answer: The proof is mentioned below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, Δ ABC is isosceles triangle.
Therefore, AB = BC
Prove: Δ ABO ≅ Δ ACO
In Δ ABO and Δ ACO,
∠ BAO ≅ ∠ CAO ( AO bisects ∠ BAC )
∠ AOB ≅ ∠ AOC ( AO is perpendicular to BC )
BO ≅ OC ( O is the mid point of BC)
Thus, By ASA postulate of congruence,
Δ ABO ≅ Δ ACO
Therefore, By CPCTC,
∠B ≅ ∠ C
Where ∠ B and ∠ C are the base angles of Δ ABC.
Answer:
y=2x−7
Step-by-step explanation:
so
formula is (
y
1
−
y
=
m
(
x
1
−
x))
m is the slope
-1-y=2(3-x)
add 1 to both sides
−y−1+1=−2x+6+1
−y=−2x+7
divide both sides by -1
y=2x−7
Hope this helps
Brainliest please
Ask if u have more questions.
