Answer:
Following is the solution for the given problem.
Explanation:
Best order size, EOQ =√2DS/H
EOQ = √2*4700*60/5
EOQ = 336 units.
D = 4700/300 = 15.66.
σ L= √∑σ²
= √3*(5)² = 8.66.
Reorder point, R = D*L+ z σ L
Reorder point, R = 15.66*3 + 1.282*8.66
Reorder point, R = 58 units.
I would say false because 'personal' is in the name. Your work doesn't really need to know the exact details (might depend on the business tho).
Answer:
B
Explanation:
being unique can be good at work but making sure you're organized doing your job is vital.
Answer:
Buyers will bear most of the burden of the tax
Explanation:
Hope it helps
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
