Answer:
No
Explanation: The key word is it was earned as result of the connection to the firm so it is split between the partners
Answer:
C) a positive result from regulatory and economic environmental forces.
Explanation:
In the short run the whole economy will benefit, more American jobs will be created, consumers will probably get good cars at even lower prices, but on the long run the scenario may not be that good for everyone. If Toyota builds the plant, it will be the result of economic and political pressures, and that is a game that two can play, just ask farmers about the trade deal with China.
On the other hand, this is a type of deja vu (or been there, done that), and it ended up with GM and Chrysler bankrupt and Ford barely surviving. This types of policies were enforced in the 1980s by president Reagan and the famous "Made in the USA" by Bruce Springsteen. Back then Honda had a small factory and Toyota was starting to consider building a plant in the US, Nissan hadn't showed up yet. Fast forward a few years and the only good American vehicles are pickups, the Japanese brands wiped out the rest. The country is full of Camrys, Accords, Civics, Corollas, CRVs and Rav4s. They are great cars, too great for the American car manufacturers to compete against. Who knows, with this type of policies maybe in 10 years the only American car manufacturer left will be Tesla.
This is like playing with fire on top of a fuel truck.
Answer:
a. Even though I was willing to pay up to $40 for a jersey sweater, I bought a jersey sweater for only $31.
Consumer Surplus;
= 40 - 31
= $9
When the amount that a consumer is willing to pay for something is more than the amount they actually pay, the difference is the Consumer surplus.
b. I sold a used laptop for $137, even though I was willing to go as low as $130 in order to sell it.
Producer Surplus
= 137 - 130
= $7
When the amount that a producer is willing to sell something for is less than the amount they actually sell it for, the difference is the Producer surplus.
c. I was willing to go as low as $130 in order to sell it A local store was having a sale on watches, so I bought a watch for my brother. Neither.
Answer:
The statement is: False.
Explanation:
In supply chain management, incremental analysis is in charge of determining the cost of ordering one more additional unit of a product over the cost of no requesting that additional unit. The cost of overstimulating demand is the loss of ordering one additional unit and discovering that it cannot be sold. The cost of underestimating demand is the opportunity loss for nor requesting one additional and discovering it could have been sold.
<em>The cost of underestimating demand is more difficult to determine than the cost of overestimating demand because underestimating demand because it involves customer's desires</em> on purchasing a product when not having the resources to do so.
Answer:
The appropriate response is "12.47%".
Explanation:
The given values are:
Borrowed amount,
= 152300
APR,
= 11.75%
i.e.,
= 0.1175
Now,
The effective annual rate will be:
= 
On substituting the given values, we get
= 
= 
= 
= 
