It is necessary so when conducting your answer or summary you have enough reason and evidence to support it
<span>cuisine has roots in latin (conquere - to cook)
ugly has roots in old norse (ugga - to dread)
touche has roots in french (originally 'touchér)
petite has and always has originated from french and it did not evolve
craze - swedish originally krassa - to crunch
blunder - Scandinavian origin and related to blind.</span>
The correct answer is D. It is not a strong example of paraphrasing. It just rearranges the original words in a new order.
Explanation:
In writing, paraphrasing implies using the ideas of an external source and author and expressing them by using your own words, because of this a strong paraphrasing would change the language used but keep the essence and main points of the original ideas. In the excerpt presented, the author tried to paraphrase a passage that describes cone snails. However, in the passage paraphrased the author uses the same terms and words than in the original passage which means he or she is not expressing the ideas of the original passage with his or her own words but only changing the order of ideas the text and therefore this is not a strong paraphrasing and can even be considered a plagiarism as the same words and ideas are being used. Therefore, this text can be described as "It is not a strong example of paraphrasing. It just rearranges the original words in a new order".
The answer would be the D) Icicles with Long points hung from the roof.
The sentence that has a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun would be this: Icicles with long points hung from the roof. The prepositional phrase in this sentence is "with long points" and it modifies the noun "icicles".
Hope this answer helps.:))
Answer:
Well it looks like the person is trying to justice for something to me and also wants to be equal with people
Explanation:
hope this helps you :)