Is this good enough??
The dreadful Passage of their death-marked Love and the continuation of their parents' wrath, which nothing could erase save their children's death, is now our stage's two-hour trafficka.
Hope it helps!!
Based on the question above, Dickens did not consider the second man as a good listener.
<h3>Synopsis</h3>
From the text, he has clearly defined a good listener.
<h3 /><h3>
Good listener</h3>
- Knowing what to listen to, the good listener also knows what not to listen to; knowing the time to listen, he also knows the time to talk. When he feels that this time has come, it is clear that he must make a better talk.
<h3>Good talker</h3>
- I also agree with Dickens on who a good talker or listener should be. A good talker knows the maxims of communication and so does a listener.
In conclusion, we can conclude that the correct answer is No. He would not consider him to be a good listener.
Learn more about Dickens here: brainly.com/question/25874822"
Answer:
Both texts describe Cupid as using arrows to cause people to love.
Explanation:
Answer:
a plethora
Explanation:
Plethora also means a lot! :)
