Answer:
A reduced time in debt
Explanation:
Gina intends to purchase that motorbike on credit. By making a down-payment, Gina is reducing the amount she needs to borrow to buy the bike.
A reduced loan amount means that Gina will require less to repay. It also implies that the interest to be paid will reduce. Making the down-payment helps Gina stay in debt for a short period.
B because it the right answer there
The answer is diminish economic growth.
- The lack of property rights will produce difficulties in the daily lives of the people, and they will not be rectified unless the government intervenes with some property rights, because everyone would grab the property with power because the property rights are not there to claim the rights.
- Negative growth is defined as a drop in a company's revenues or earnings, or a drop in an economy's GDP in any quarter. Negative growth is characterized by declining wage growth and a decline of the money supply, and economists consider negative growth as a precursor to a future recession or depression.
- Economists usually believe that four variables drive economic development and growth: human resources, physical capital, natural resources, and technology.
Thus this is the meaning of diminish economic growth.
To learn more about economic growth, refer: brainly.com/question/18964806
#SPJ4
Nirav recently opened a savings account offering 2% annual compound interest, this means that Nirav will earn the same amount of interest each year for four years.
<h3>What is a saving account?</h3>
An account at a retail bank is formally called as a savings account. This is a type of account that person granted a person that his money is safe in a particular bank. Refer to the image below for the complete question.
The given case tells about that <u>what would be the impact</u> of savings account offering 2% annual compound interest on Nirav, then he will earn the same amount of interest compounded each year for four years.
Learn more about the interest, refer to:
brainly.com/question/1040694
#SPJ1
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
