Answer:
About 7% is the anwser i tried 4% and i got it wrong and it said 7 was correct
We can express this number in the standard form, which is simply 15xyz+10xy+5x. Alternatively, we can factor a 5 or an x out, receiving 5(3xyz+2xy+x) or x(15yz+10y+5). However, the most effective factorization is to factor out 5x, for a result of 5x(3yz+2y+1).
325 meters if using full height of 324 meters for tower
277 meters if using observation platform height of 276 meters.
When the depression is 37 degrees, you can create a right triangle with the angles 90, 37, and 53 degrees. The distance from a point directly underneath the observer will be:
h/tan(37)
where
h = height of the observer.
And when the depression is 72 degrees, the distance will be:
h/tan(72)
So the distance between the two points will be the absolute value of:
h/tan(72) - h/tan(37)
=(tan(37)h)/tan(37)tan(72) - tan(72)h/(tan(37)tan(72))
=(tan(37)h - tan(72)h) /(tan(37)tan(72))
=h(0.75355405 - 3.077683537)/(0.75355405 * 3.077683537)
=h(0.75355405 - 3.077683537)/(0.75355405 * 3.077683537)
=h(-2.324129487/2.319200894)
=h*-1.002125125
And since we're looking for absolute value
=h*1.002125125
As for the value of "h" to use, that's unspecified in the problem. If you take h
to be the height of the Eiffel Tower, then it's 324 meters. If you take h to be
the highest observation platform on the Eiffel Tower, then it's 276 meters. In
any case, simply multiply h by the value calculated above:
=h*1.002125125
=324*1.002125125
= 324.6885406 m
=h*1.002125125
=276*1.002125125
=276.5865346
Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
