An example of a hypothesis for an experiment might be: “A basketball will bounce higher if there is more air it”
Step one would be to make an observation... “hey, my b-ball doesn’t have much air in it, and it isn’t bouncing ver high”
Step two is to form your hypothesis: “A basketball will bounce higher if there is more air it”
Step three is to test your hypothesis: maybe you want to drop the ball from a certain height, deflate it by some amount and then drop it from that same height again, and record how high the ball bounced each time.
Here the independent variable is how much air is in the basketball (what you want to change) and the dependent variable is how high the b-ball will bounce (what will change as a result of the independent variable)
Step four is to record all of your results and step five is to analyze that data. Does your data support your hypothesis? Why or why not?
You should only test one variable at a time because it is easier to tell why the results are how they are; you only have one cause.
Hope this helps!
I think the statement is false. Racewalking involves less impact than running. It <span> is a long-distance discipline within the sport of athletics. Although it is a foot race, it is different from running in that one foot must appear to be in contact with the ground.</span>
Answer:
in 1 second 3m, in 2 seconds 6m, in 3 seconds 9m.
Explanation:
distance=speed × time
<span>Visible satellite images are like photos which are dependent on visible
light from the sun so they work best during the day. The sensor works by
detecting radiation within the range that wavelength is visible. Because of
this, the rays is usually seen as reaching earth from the East. </span>
Hello!
Gold is often found in a pure form in nature because it does not easily react with other elements. This characteristic is also defined as inert because it does not oxidize easily unlike other elements, such as iron.
I really hope my answer helped you out! :)
