Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4
Option 1: PV = $400,000
Option 2: Receive (FV) $432,000 in one year
PV = FV(1/(1+i)^n), where i= 8% = 0.08, n = 1 year
PV = 432,000(1/(1+0.08)^1) = $400,000
Option 3: Receive (A) $40,000 each year fro 20 years
PV= A{[1-(1+i)^-n]/i} where, n = 20 years
PV = 40,000{[1-(1+0.08)^-20]/0.08} = $392,725.90
Option 4: Receive (A) $36,000 each year from 30 years
PV = 36,000{[1-(1+0.08)^-30]/0.08} = $405,280.20
On the basis of present value computations above, option 4 is the best option for Kerry Blales. This option has the highest present value of $405,280.20
Answer: c. A bilateral contract
Explanation:
In a bilateral contract, the parties involved promise to both perform duties to the other which will make them both an obligor and an obligee.
An obligor is one who owes a duty to another and the obligee is one who a duty is owed to.
Aaron both owes a duty to sell the boat to Matt as well as being owed by Matt the duty to buy his boat. The same goes for Matt thus making this a bilateral contract.
Answer:
It will increase by 50%
Explanation:
Equity is given as: credit - short market value.
Find attached below table of solution
Answer:
The correct answer is b) Be able to use his or her skills.
Explanation:
Melanie Gollick believes that employees must be able to develop and use their skills to perform work in the hospital. But the use of these skills will depend on the personality of each person and the way they adapt to carry out group work.
Skills refer to a set of skills that each person presents, this ability may be different for each person, for example, a person who works in the health area in a hospital needs to be among their skills, work under pressure, follow instructions, empathy, adaptation, group work, among others.
<em />
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
