There are many valid points in Orwell's essay with which we agree. The main points relating to politics and English language are follows,
I agree that the people are now paying less attention to the grammar of English, people are finding ways to simplify the daily communication.
They paying less attention to the grammar makes English look a different language than what it was initially.
I disagree when Orwell's when he writes about the meaning less words, he explains that some words used in stories are meaning less to the reader, while as a story book reader fan I think that each word or set of words ease the imaging of story.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24374672
Answer:
Did you see Nathan yesterday? (Second Sentence)
Explanation:
- The second sentence is correct because it has the right punctuation and correct spelling.
- The first sentence looks correct, but yesterday is spelt wrong.
- The third sentence uses the wrong punctuation mark.
The answer is A thank me later
<span>By showing how Carolyn’s family lives in a way that is similar to him, Soto supports the idea that there are very few differences among cultures.
I believe this is correct, because there are many descriptive words in the passage. If Soto would have left these words out the reader would not know where the story takes place.
</span>
Answer: In the first stanza, the poet's tone is sad and serious, disturbed, at not seeing anyone like herself in the magazines. She seems ashamed to be black.
In the second stanza the poet's word choices show a sense of pride: queenly, honey-colored, bronzed skin... The tone has shifted to confident and joyful. The images she describes-- nappy hair, thick lips... purple lips, shining pearls-- are part of who she is, and make her proud to be black, and should inspire the reader to see black as beautiful too.