Answer: $8025
Explanation:
From the information given, first and foremost, we need to realise that only the building in this case will be depreciated due to the fact that land is considered to be a non depreciable asset.
Therefore, the MACRS depreciation charge for year 1 will then be:
= MACRS rate × Value of Building
= 1.605% × $500,000
= 0.01605 × $500,000
= $8025
Answer:
b) Heightened global competition
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that working as a distributor of an automative part i.e. based on the Ohia diversifies its business operations in China. Also the employees and the management are working with this division and taking the classes on the chinese culture and their customs in order to feel comfortable
So this scenario represents that the global competition is on the peak
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer: Consumer share risk with company.
Explanation:
Insurance involves the sharing of risk between a client and his insurer. In insurance the insurer takes a large portion of the risk while the client covers the rest of risk payment.
A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority. After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.
- Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
- Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
- Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
- Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
- Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.
Learn more about minority popularity here:
brainly.com/question/14457086
#SPJ4
Answer
Hi,
Progressive tax assesses a taxpayer’s ability to pay. Higher rates are on the wealthy than on the poor.
Explanation
Those considered poor according to a country’s definition have families who spend larger shares of their income on the cost of living thus all money they earn is needed to afford basic needs thus face a decreased progressive tax. On the other hand, the progressive tax imposed on wealthy individuals decrease their abilities to purchase more luxury items or invest in stock.
Hope this helps!
