Answer:
6.75%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the Rate formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
This is correct Present value = $976.87
Assuming figure - Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 6.5% = $65
NPER = 15 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER,PMT,-PV,FV,type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this, the answer would be 6.75%
Answer:
The question has below options:
A. The unsold cars count as inventory investment for 2017. 2018 GDP is not affected.
B.The unsold cars count as consumption spending in 2018.
C. The unsold cars count in the inventory investment category for both years and count as consumption spending in 2018.
Option B is the correct answer
Explanation:
The unsold stock of 10 cars in 2017 is classified as investment since the cost of producing them is expected to yield returns in 2018 when they have been sold.
However, the unsold stock of 2017 becomes 2018 consumption of GDP since it relates to household expenditure in 2018, as a result it is accorded such classification.
It cannot be classified as government expenditure as the government is not the one purchasing the vehicle
Also, the ten cars have nothing to do with import or export as they are trade within the domestic economy
The correct option is (b) Protective tariffs
Protective tariffs aim to make imported goods more expensive while protecting domestic producers from overseas rivalry.
<h3 /><h3>What is protective tarrifs?</h3>
- An illustration of a protective tariff would be the US raising the customs charge on clothing imported from Britain so that it is significantly more expensive than clothing made domestically.
- The importing countries profit the most from tariffs since they design the policy and receive the cash.
- The main advantage of tariffs is that they generate income from imported products and services. Tariffs may also serve as a springboard for negotiations between two countries.
- Protective tariffs are designed to shield vital American industries from international competition, stop foreign manufacturers from dumping inexpensive goods in the US, or both.
Learn more about the Tarrifs with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/11672570
#SPJ4
I understand that the question you are looking for is "Which of these actions was an economic cause of increased tensions between the North and South?
(a) Dred Scott decision
(b) Protective tariffs
(c) Bleeding Kansas
(d) Lincoln’s election"
It would be because of Non selling activities
Never gunna give you up never gunna let you down, sorry I don’t know the answer, oops…
