The correct answer is A) alignment.
After spending months finalizing a marketing plan, the lead marketing manager presents it to the entire company. It soon becomes clear that the budget given in the plan is far lower than the marketing team had determined it would need. This mistake is likely a result of a lack of alignment.
This means that the marketing manager did not respect the parameters originally indicated. His numbers did not align with the necessities of the plan, which means that he did not take into consideration some important factors that at the end, affected the end result of the budget.
Answer:
B. Target costing forces design engineers to explicitly consider the costs of manufacturing and other aspects of business that traditionally fall outside the engineering department
Explanation:
Target costing needs the design engineers to be active in meeting their customers projection, but it must be inside the target cost requirements. Engineers can not afford to just have their attention on the function and form of design, they must also observe cost under Target costing.
Please see attached image to see the
given data.
The trial balance
totals of the debits and credits are $2,250 debit, $2,250 credit.
<span>$1000 (cash) +
$500 (Equipment) + $750 (Salaries Expense) = $2,250 Debit
$350 (Accounts Payable) + $900 (Capital) + $1000 (Service Fees) = $2,250 Credit</span>
Answer:
Here all of these options are wrong , the correct answer is regardless of how the tax is levied the burden of tax would be shared by both the seller and buyer.
Explanation:
Tax can be said as primary source of income for the government. When a tax is levied on the goods , the burden of that would have to be bear by both buyer and seller , irrelevant of how that levied . If the taxes are high then the demand by buyer would be less and seller would receive low price because less people would buy and n the case where taxes are low demand would be high and seller would receive high prices ,in both cases tax would be levied on both seller and buyer and how much it would be depends upon the elasticity of demand and supply. So all the statements given here are false or invalid.
Answer: $2
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that an investor purchases a stock for $38 and a put for $.50 with a strike price of $35 and that the investor sells a call for $.50 with a strike price of $40.
The maximum profit for this position will be the purchase price of the stock deducted from the strike price of call option. This will be:
= $40 - $38
= $2
