I agree with this statement because with media involved in his speech it would have less fact because media doesn't always have reliable information
Bland?
I think this is the correct answer.
Answer:
Ambiguous facts.
Explanation:
A reader may always interpret; facts, symbols, etc... according to her/his own perspective. However, when you add ambiguousness to the fact, as the noun says, you create and cause confusion, as the fact is considered unclear. So if facts are always open to one's interpretation, an ambiguous fact is definitely super open to interpretation!
<u>Answer:</u>
Puritans were protestors in 16th and 17th century who scared people with their sermons.
<u>Explanation:</u>
“Sermon” is a religious talk given in church. Puritans wanted to purify the ''Church of England'' from the ''Roman catholic practices''. They observed that there is a decrease in the number of religious devotees of ''second-generation'' settlers. To increase this, they 'preached' a type of sermon called "jeremiad". This sermon basically wanted to scare people by stating that if anyone committed any sin, they would be tortured and burnt in hell.
By all this, people would remain Puritan and believe in God and Church.