Answer:
No, he should <u>not</u> pick up the $100 bill
Explanation:
If his salary were those $20 billion (20,000,000,000) by a year. Let's find out how much this is by a second.
First let's find out how much is that salary by <em>a day</em>, then by <em>an hour</em>, then by <em>a minute</em> and finally by <em>a second</em>.
So he would be losing money if he picks up the $100 bill, because he would be missing 634 dollars per second.
Answer: c. the degree that businesses rely on each other for information and decision making.
Explanation:
Information Technology has enabled firms of all sizes and types to be able to access information that they need for themselves instead of having to rely on third-party providers that would provide data to them at a high cost.
This has enabled these businesses to rely less on other companies for decision making as well as become more efficient at it because they are able to use varied sources of information not just what they would have acquired from other companies.
Answer:
a. $700,000
b. 6/7 or 85.7%
c. No they will not.
Explanation:
a. Jacobs will earn the normal salary that the other designers in the other companies are getting in addition to the incremental income he brings to the company as a result of his talents.
Incremental income = Revenue with Jacobs - Revenue without Jacobs
= 1,000,000 - 400,000
= $600,000
Jacobs earnings = Normal designer earnings + incremental income
= 100,000 + 600,000
= $700,000
b. Economic rent is the excess amount that the company is paying Jacobs over what it should normally cost to get a designer.
Normal cost of designer is $100,000. Company is therefore paying an economic rent of $600,000.
Proportion of Jacobs salary that is economic rent =
=
= 6/7 or 85.7%
c. The company hiring Jacobs will not be making an economic profit because for them to make an economic profit they would have to be making more than the $400,000 that the other firms make. They cannot make this amount because for them to do so they would have to reduce the amount they pay Jacobs. If they do so, Jacobs would leave for greener pastures and then they would be making the same $400,000 that the rest are making.
Answer: The Loan Estimate, The Closing Disclosure, and The Notice of the Right to Rescind
Explanation:
Answer:
A. 29.6%
Explanation:
Return on Equity is the times of profit a owner can earn on the equity investment in the business. Higher ratio shows the business is more profitable.
As per given data
Net Income = $36,610
Average Equity = $123650
Return on Equity ( ROE ) = Net Income / Equity Investment
Return on Equity ( ROE ) = $36,610 / $123650
Return on Equity ( ROE ) = 0.296
Return on Equity ( ROE ) = 29.6%