Answer:
<u>A Strategic Alliance</u>
Explanation:
A Strategic Alliance refers to a combined effort or activities of two firms so as to strengthen their market position and yet at the same time maintain their individual separate corporate existence.
It represents a mutually beneficial agreement between two corporate firms under which, terms are less binding and stringent than a joint venture.
The purpose behind such an alliance could be, expansion, product line improvement or together gain a competitive advantage.
Such an alliance helps both businesses achieve a common goal driven by mutual assistance and pooling of resources.
In the given case, the tie up between Caffery computer corp. and Chicago desktop to sell computer locking systems alongside computers, would be termed a strategic alliance, since such an arrangement would benefit both, reduce competition for each with collective gain w.r.t market share.
Answer: A. Aggregate demand does not affect the quantity of output.
Explanation: Aggregate supply curve is perfectly vertical in a long run, Economist believed that the changes in aggregate demand only caused a temporal change in an economy output
Aggregate supply in a short run, the quantity supplies increase as price rise.
Aggregate demand does not affect the quantity of output If the aggregate supply is vertical.
Answer:
Ten pounds of chicken to trade for at least <u>40</u> pounds of vegetables but not more than<u> 50</u> pounds of vegetables
Explanation:
Vegetables Chicken Trade Off Ratio
John 40 10 4:1 (40/10) or 1:0.25 (10/40)
George 25 5 5:1 (25/5) or 1:0.20 (5/25)
John has comparative advantage in Chicken and George has comparative advantage in Veggies because :
- John's chicken opportunity cost, in veggies < George (4<5). George's veggies opportunity cost, in chicken < John (0.20<0.25).
- George is more (5X) productive in veggies than chicken, than John (4X). John is less unproductive in chicken than veggies (1/4th), compared to George (1/5th).
So, John will sell Chicken to George & George will sell veggies to John. Gains from trade are when each get trade ratio better than their their own trade off ratio.
- It implies: John gets >' 4 pounds veggies per chicken pound' and George gets > '0.20 pound chicken per veggie pound'.
- Unitary method:- '1chicken : 4veggies' = '10chickens : 40veggies' and '0.20chicken : 1veggie' = '10chickens : 50 veggies' .
Answer:
$200 million
$30 million
Explanation:
When the requiredreserce ratio is 15 percent or 0.15 , then the money multiplier is (1 / required reserve ratio) or (1/0.15 = 0.67)
Now, change in money supply = money multiplier * open market purchase of government bonds.
Here , the Federal Reserve a $30 million open market purchase Of govemment bonds.
As a result of this;
Money Supply increases by (6.7 * $30 million) = $200 million.
This is the maximum amount the money supply could Increase.
Now, if the bank holds. $30 million as excess reserves, then money supply could increase by as much as $30 million. This is the smallest amount themoney supply could increase.
So, If the required reserve ratio is 15 percent the largest possible increase in the money supply that could result is $200 million- and the smallest possible increase is $30 million.
False
Explanation
Because it didn’t have a standard weight and it was average
