Answer:
"Marchionini and Maurer (1995b) did not see libraries as having three roles in learning".
Explanation:
In order to present the negative form of a sentence, you must first observe what is the verb that sentence presents. A verb is any word that indicates the performance of an action, or the existence of a state of mind or behavior. In the case of the above sentence, the verb is the word "saw" which is the past form of the verb "to see". The negative sentence must show that this action, determined by the verb, was not performed.
The verb "saw" needs an auxiliary verb to present its negative form, this auxiliary is the word "do" which will assist the verb "saw" both in presenting the negative form and in presenting the verb in the past tense. Thus, the "do" should be presented in the past tense instead of "saw", then "do" will be presented as "did" and "saw" will be presented as "see". The word "not" must be presented in the sentence, to show the concept of negativity, but it will be associated with the auxiliary verb and therefore it must be presented after "did" and before "see", forming the expression "did not see "which should replace the verb" saw "in the original sentence.
Therefore, the sentence in its negative form would be: "Marchionini and Maurer (1995b) did not see libraries as having three roles in learning".
So first you would want to round the numbers to the nearest tenth.
243.9 + 132.4= 376.3
<span>The correct answer is D stick to your subject. By sticking to your subject, you will essentially be writing with the purpose of upholding your thesis, or argument, which is the most important aspect of a paper. Option A is incorrect because this depends on the piece you're writing. For example, if you're writing a short story, then a description based on one of your senses would be excellent imagery. However, if you're writing an argument paper, it would be better to offer a description based on reputable sources. B and C are both incorrect, because you will want to include relevant details. You shouldn't take away details that would support your thesis, and you shouldn't add irrelevant details that would take away from your argument.</span>
Answer:
I <u><em>THINK</em></u> it's C
Explanation:
I SAID I <em><u>THINK</u></em>!!!
so don't get me wrong
