<span>Blacks didn't get a fair deal in court because there were no black jurors, that meant that the jury was all white, and that kind of jury would not ever give a not guilty verdict to a black man, especially if a crime was committed against a white, it didn't matter how trashy and despicable the white guy was.
The jurors are from the country and not town to ensure that they were not "biased" against any of the parties involved.(they were from the town)</span><span>
</span>
Television news gain credibility and likability by doing the news <span>live on the spot reporting. This makes the news more convincing and this would convince people that it is true and believable. In addition, prints are also another form of news, but this gains credibility through neutrality. Hope this helps.</span>
An example of politicians' deliberate slanting of facts is: C. the claim that free trade is the cause for the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs.
In English language, a fact is an evidential information provided about a specific event, topic, or subject matter in its actual and true conditions.
This ultimately implies that, a fact clearly and concisely presents the fundamental reality of a thing (subject) based on an empirical study and/or objective consensus.
Slanting of facts refers to an act in which a speaker or writer includes his or her biased ideas or opinions when presenting a fact to an audience. Thus, it typically involves selecting facts that essentially favors your bias while discrediting the true situation of things.
In this context, the claim that free trade is the cause for the loss of millions of manufacturing jobs is an example of politicians' deliberate slanting of facts because is more likely to open up a country's economy for increased trade and by extension creating more employment opportunities in the manufacturing sector.
Find more information: brainly.com/question/11428078
