Answer:
36.36%
Explanation:
Return on investment is given as;
Profit / Cost of goods sold × 100%
Given that profit is $12,000 and sales is $45,000 ;
Cost of goods sold
= $45,000 - $12,000
= $33,000
Therefore, return on investment is
= 12,000 / 33,000 × 100%
= 36.36%
I’m happy to answer this question if you can give me more detail.
Answer: d. All of the Above
Explanation:
All the above senior managers are more likely to apply more Domestic HRM practices to make them International HRM practices when they are put into a situation where International practices will be needed.
This is because they have been with the Domestic companies for much of their time and so know more about Domestic practices than international.
The first options refers to senior managers in firms with large domestic markets. To be a senior manager demands experience in the market they are in so it is not far fetched to say that they are more knowledgeable in domestic practices than international.
The second option speaks of managers with little International experience meaning they are more likely to engage in transferability between domestic and International practices.
The third option speaks of managers who built their careers on domestic experience. They will find it hard letting go of what has brought them such success so will more likely apply domestic practices on an international scale.
If there is an increase in government spending, the new equilibrium will be at <u>B</u> holding everything else constant.
<h3>What is government spending?</h3>
Government spending can be the defined as the money spent on goods and service or money spent by government to provide services to the public.
An increase in government spending will tend to lead to increase the demand of goods and service which inturn means that consumption expenditure will as well increase.
Inconclusion the new equilibrium will be at <u>B</u> holding everything else constant.
Learn more about Government spending here:brainly.com/question/27232573
Answer:
Explanation:
Here Nicolas will gain comparative advantage only when he is selling the good he is specializing in and he would specialize in that good which would have lower opportunity cost for him. So the first step that we have to do here is to find out for which good Nicolas will have lower opportunity cost.
For Nicolas who in 8 hours can either catch 24 pound of fish or repair 15 cars,
the opportunity cost for catching 1 fish is = 15/24 = .625
the opportunity cost for repairing 1 car is = 24/15 = 1.6
So from the above observation we can say that for Nicolas catching fish has lower opportunity cost for him , so he should specialize in catching fish.
Therefore the term of trade for Nicolas would be
1 fish = .625 cars ,
if he can catch and sell 100 units worth of fish then he would have to give up 62.5 cars and then only he will gain from trade,
1 x 100 fish = .625 x 100
100 fish = 62.5 cars.