Answer:
C. $737,500
Explanation:
The formula to compute the ending balance of retained earning is shown below:
The ending balance of retained earning = Beginning balance of retained earnings + net income - dividend paid
= $659,000 + $220,000 - $141,500
= $737,500
The net income is calculated below:
= Sales revenues - expenses
$600,000 - $380,000
= $220,000
Answer: A. Departments with more employees are allocated earlier.
Explanation:
In the sequential method, it should be noted that a company allocates the service costs one department at a time. Once the service department cost is allocated by the accountants, the department won't get any other costs from the other service departments.
The statement that is false about the order in which management determines the sequencing of support department allocations under the sequential method of allocating support department costs to production departments is that the departments with more employees are allocated earlier.
Under the sequential method, the department costs that are allocated earlier include having an accurate cost drivers, having a higher cost, or having a large number of support.
Answer:
Saver's credit = $0
Explanation:
He is not entitled to any saver's credit, as he is not married and his AGI is greater than $32,000. Therefore the Saver's credit is equal to zero. Is also important to consider that Desmond is a head of a household and his AIG is between 31,126 and 48,000.
Answer:
Net present value of proposal $168,166
Explanation:
Check attachment
Answer:
Answer for the question:
There are ten polluting firms, Firm1,. . . ,Firm10. Each firm emits 100 pounds of pollution prior to any regulations (so there are currently 1,000 pounds being emitted). Each firm has constant marginal abatement costs, but the costs vary across firms. Conveniently, the firms’ names indicate their marginal abatement costs. Firm1’s marginal abatement costs are constant at $1 per pound, Firm2’s marginal abatement costs are constant at $2 per pound,. . . , and Firm10’s marginal abatement costs are $10 per pound.
a. Suppose the regulator wants to achieve a 25% reduction in pollution (250 pounds). What is the cost effective allocation of emis- sions across the ten firms?
b. What are the total abatement costs for society to achieve a 250 pound reduction in emissions?
c. The marginal damage of pollution in this city is given by MD= 4-1/250 X, where X is the total reduction in pollution. What is the optimal level of pollution?
is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
