Answer:
Neither parallel nor perpendicular
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant line k is y = 3x -2. If not, this is wrong.
For this, you need to put both lines in point-slope form, or the form that line k is already in. This means you only need to convert line m.
-2r + 6v = 18
6v = 2r + 18
v = 2/6r + 18/6
v = 1/3r + 3
Now you can answer the question.
To be parallel, lines must have the same slope (but a different y-intercept). 3 and 1/3 are not the same, so the lines are not parallel.
To be perpendicular, one line must have the opposite reciprocal (fraction flipped and + goes to - or - to +) of the other. While 3 is the reciprocal of 1/3, they are both positive, so they are not perpendicular.
To be the same line, the equations must be absolutely identical, which they aren't.
This leaves the last option: neither.
Let me know if you need a more in-depth explanation of anything here! I'm happy to help!
Answer:
x +0y+0z = 400
-x +y+0z = 150
-8x +0y +z = 250
Step-by-step explanation:
The last column is the solution
The rest of the columns are the coefficients of the variables
x +0y+0z = 400
-x +y+0z = 150
-8x +0y +z = 250
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the exponential function be,
Here, C = cost of the car
t = Duration or period in years
From the given table,
Two points representing cost of the car and time are (10000, 0) and (8520, 1),
For (10000, 0),
a = 10000
For (8520, 1)
8520 = 
b = 0.8520
Therefore, exponential equation will be,
Answer:
20.04
Step-by-step explanation:
He marked it down to 67%. Not up
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
These are the terms of a geometric sequence with n th term
= a
Where a is the first term and r the common ratio
r = 
= 
= 
= 2
and a = 5, hence explicit equation is
= 5
