Answer:
It should listen to his mother.
Explanation:
This week cash flow handled the fixed cost of 10 to Raymond's brother.
His father is not considering that so it thinks the business flops.
Now that fixed cost are paid the following weeks his gains will increase entirely based on the sales volume so, it is better to continue the business for the next three weeks.
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Given that
Total revenue is $70,000
Total fixed cost is $40,000
And, the total variable cost is $10,000
According to the given situation, the computation of profit is shown below:-
Profit = Total Revenue - Total Fixed cost - Total variable cost
= $70,000 - (10,000 × $4) - 10,000
= $70,000 - 40,000 - 10,000
= $10,000
Therefore for computing the profit we simply applied the above formula.
The common denominator for decisions on service processes is customer contact while but for manufacturing processes, it is product variety.
<h3>What is a common denominator?</h3>
This refers to the feature that is shared by all members, item, quantity of a subject matter.
Hence, the common denominator for decisions on service processes is customer contact while but for manufacturing processes, it is product variety.
Read more about common denominator
<em>brainly.com/question/542317</em>
#SPJ12
i don't no but pls give me the crown
Answer:
A) Laws represent the minimum guidelines that companies must follow,whereas a firm's ethical stance may venture beyond the minimum level of compliance.
Explanation:
In the given scenario there are laws that allows community and state police to set up sobriety check points that discourages drunk drivers and saves lives.
The inclusion or removal of applications that helps drunk drivers avoid these checkpoints is not covered by the law. So if a company decides to include such applications it is at their discretion.
Blackberry have chosen to remove applications that helps drunk drivers avoid checkpoints. This is an example of when a company has ventured beyond the minimum level of compliance because of their ethical stance.
Google and Apple however have only ventured beyond the minimum compliance level because they have refused to honour requests by legislators to remove apps that permit smartphone users to navigate around the checkpoints.
