Based on this question, one thing that we would seriously consider would be the fact of first, doing
first. By doing this, it would then give us our answer as 16. By us understanding this point of view, we would then consider that this would then be your answer. That would then include that there would then be 16 pairs of the "enantiomeric pairs", and that would then be the possible estimate.
<span>a.2
b.4
c.8
d.16</span>
Answer:
x(x+3)(x−10)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this was helpful let me know if it was!
Answer:
0.6
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
i think taht yes my dear friend lol
Step-by-step explanation:
We can write the function in terms of y rather than h(x)
so that:
y = 3 (5)^x
A. The rate of change is simply calculated as:
r = (y2 – y1) / (x2 – x1) where r stands for rate
Section A:
rA = [3 (5)^1 – 3 (5)^0] / (1 – 0)
rA = 12
Section B:
rB = [3 (5)^3 – 3 (5)^2] / (3 – 2)
rB = 300
B. We take the ratio of rB / rA:
rB/rA = 300 / 12
rB/rA = 25
So we see that the rate of change of section B is 25
times greater than A