The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the article or the text. You also forgot to include the name of the author or the title of the article.
Without the text, we do not know what is its content. Just you know.
However, trying to offer some help, we can comment on the following.
Recently, authors have divided their opinions about the advantages or disadvantages of paying college student-athletes.
The ones who are in favor of paying athletes argue that schools receive a lot of money due to TV agreements, ticket sales, merchandising, and concessions. That is why they deserve a "slice of the pie."
On the other hand, the authors that disagree and still consider that college athletes are amateurs, support their arguments saying that they are students, and the way they are receiving compensation is through their scholarships. And these authors say that schools invest a lot of money not only in academics but in facilities and equipment to have their athletes ready to compete and win.
When she was a child, one Christmas Tita recieved a special gift from Nacha, the De la Garza’s partially deaf cook who practically raised Tita after her father died. Nacha saved money and got Tita a zoetrope, which is a device that produces the illusion of motion by displaying on the wall a sequence of drawings or photographs. Tita <em>loved </em>that present and used to watch the pictures with her sisters for hours.
Answer:
what am I supposed answer
Explanation:
Answer:
Both choices are correct
Explanation:
In the play Oedipus is searching for Laius' murderer because an oracle tells him only when the murderer is punished will a plague end, but at the end we learn that he is the murderer. So that makes him a criminal and a detective.
