Answer:
x= -7/8
Step-by-step explanation:
8x + 7 = 0
8x + 7-7 = 0-7
8x=-7
8x/8x = -7/8
Answer:
8.9k
Step-by-step explanation:
We just have to add together the length of the three sides to find the perimeter of the triangle.
(1.8k-5)+(3.5+6.1k)+(k+1.5) = 1.8k-5+3.5+6.1k+k+1.5
Combine like terms.
1.8k<em>-5+3.5</em>+6.1k+k<em>+1.5</em> = 8.9k <em>+ 0 </em>
= 8.9k
Answer:
30%
Step-by-step explanation:
Think of this as converting a fraction. 28/40 to x/100. You do this because in the situation, 40 is 100 percent of the price. So 28 is <em>x</em> percent of 100.
You multiply 40 by 2.5 to get to 100, so multiply 28 by the same number to get x. 28 * 2.5 = 70.
So 28 is 70 percent of 40. But the question is asking by what percentage it is <em>discounted. </em>If it's now selling for 70%, it has been discounted 30%. So the answer is 30%
<span>x = Joe's age and </span><span>y = James's age
</span><span>Joe is 10 years older than James - equation - x = y + 10
</span><span>In 8 years twice Joe's age will equal three times James's age - equation -
2(x+8) = 3(y+8)
</span>
<span>2(x+8) = 3(y+8) </span>
<span>2(y + 10 +8) = 3(y+8) { substitute y + 10 for x </span>
<span>2(y + 18) = 3(y + 8) </span>
<span>2y + 36 = 3y + 24 </span>
<span>12 = y </span>
<span>Joe is 22 and James is 12.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: In this experiment, distance from the highway is a:___, would be: lurking variable.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lurking variables, also known as confounding variables, are factors, or elements that may be part of a relationship between two variables being measured, but that were not considered within the original design of the study, and which can alter the conclusions and results to which a study can point. In this case, the researchers wished to compare the effectiveness of a fertilizer on the process of corn cultivation. The plots selected were each given one type of fertilizer at random and the results were to be measured by how much corn was produced by the plot of land. Although the two variables originally measured were fertilizer vs. corn production, the design did not consider that there would be an additional factor that could play a role. However, in the end, this new, or lurking, variable, confounded the design because now another factor had to be calculated; that those plots of land closer to the highway experienced higher rates of corn growth than those further away.
