Answer:
The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.
On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.
If sales agent jane first contacted john, after her three-month vacation to barbados. No, seller john was not her client?
<h3>Who is a sales agent?</h3>
A sales agent can be defined as someone whose sole responsibility is to sell product to potential customers and to as well market product to buyer.
Hence, seller John is not her client based on the fact that both John and Jane did not agreed on any agency relationship terms and agreement.
Learn more about sales agent here:brainly.com/question/25743891
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. forget the repairs and sell the house as it is for $250,000.
Explanation:
The best option from the shown is to foget about the repairs and directly seel it at $250,000 because that leaves her with a loss of $50,000 instead of a $60,000 loss on her money, that is the best option financially. Also as the time passes the plan for the creation of the landfill downstreet will become more and more known and the value could decrease more.
No, its okay not to use all that extra stuff, so F
