No, the average change in population is not the same as it was 50 years ago.
Reason in Support of the Answer:
In many important ways, the demographic future of the United States and the rest of the world is substantially different from the recent past. The world's average population approximately tripled between 1950 and 2010, and the U.S. population nearly doubled.
However, it is anticipated that between 2010 and 2050, both globally and in the United States, average population growth will be substantially slower and will disproportionately favor the oldest age groups. Hence it is seen that the average change in population is never constant. It depends on the demographic trends and conditions, whether the average change in population will be larger or comparatively trivial in the future. And, similarly, it can be said that the average change in population is not the same as it was 50 years ago.
Learn more about average here:
brainly.com/question/2426692
#SPJ1
Answer:
B = 55°
b = 17.1 (rounded to the nearest tenth)
c = 20.9 (rounded to the nearest tenth)
Answer:
the 24×4 you have to count 4 times
Answer: D
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph is narrower, so the coefficient of 
has an absolute value more than 1.
Also, because g(x) opens down, the coefficient of is negative.
This leaves D as the answer.
Answer:
36h+81m
Step-by-step explanation:
9*4h+9*9m=36h+81m
