The answer is true because it need not coincide with the calendar of the week, but may begin on any day and at any hour of the day
Answer:C
Explanation: this quantity is allocatively inefficient because the marginal cost of producing the last lawnmower exceeds the marginal benefit to consumers.
Answer:
From this information one can conclude that last period the variable overhead efficiency (quantity) variance was <u>unfavorable.</u>
Explanation:
The variable overhead efficiency variance measures the difference between the actual and budgeted hours worked with respect to standard variable overhead rate per hour.
Variable overhead efficiency variance can be calculated thus:
Actual labor hours less budgeted labor hours x Hourly rate for standard variable overhead
If the time it takes to manufacture a product and the time budgeted for it matches or performs well, the labor efficiency is favorable.
Variable overhead efficiency variance is deemed unfavorable when it takes the company more time than budgeted to produce. This also shows labor efficiency variance was unfavorable.
Answer: a) $(11.3) million
b)$1,286.7million
c)$40.6 million
Explanation:This does not involve lengthy explanation.
(a) Other comprehensive income for 2017 =unrealized holding loss =available-for-sale securities during the year= $(11.3) million
(b) Comprehensive income for 2017= net income-unrealized holding loss =
$1,286.7million (1,298 - 11.3)
(c) Accumulated other comprehensive income = accumulated other comprehensive income -unrealized holding loss
$40.6 million (51.9 - 11.3)
Answer:
≈ 25%
Explanation:
Given data:
Cpk = 0.22
Determine The percentage of production that falls beyond the specification limit ( assuming normal distribution )
first calculate the value of Z ;
Cpk = Z /3
hence Z = Cpk * 3 = 0.22 * 3 = 0.66
The percentage of the production can be determined by
( 1 - value obtained from the standard normal table for the value of Z =0.66 )
1 - 0.7454 = 0.2546 ≈ 25%
