All categories

2 years ago

What does 3rd person omniscient mean

Mathematics

1 answer:

mojhsa [17]2 years ago

3 0

The third-person omniscient point of view is a method of storytelling in which the narrator knows the thoughts and feelings of all of the characters in the story, as opposed to third-person limited, which adheres closely to one character's -- usually the main character's -- perspective.

You might be interested in

HELP PICTURE IS SHOWN

dalvyx [7]

A D E

Not AAS it doesn't have two angles in each triangle

7 0

2 years ago

Use the table to determine whether the relationship is proportional. If so, write an equation for the relationship. Tell what ea

Neporo4naja [7]

Answer:

y = 25x, proportional relationship

Step-by-step explanation:

Let "x" = number of hours read (replace with "h" if that's the variable your teacher wants)

Let "y" = number of pages read (you can use any other variables if you want)

Let's first calculate the slope using $\frac{y_{1} - y_{2}}{x_{1} - x_{2}}$ with any two points, I'm going to use (2, 50) and (3, 75):

$\frac{y_{1} - y_{2}}{x_{1} - x_{2}} = \frac{50 - 75}{2 - 3} = \frac{-25}{-1} = 25$

Our slope is m = 25.

Now we can use the point-slope form $y-y_{1} = m(x-x_{1})$ with our slope and any point (I'll use (2, 50)) to figure out the equation:

$y-y_{1} = m(x-x_{1}) \\ y-50 = 25(x-2)$

Simplify:

$y-50 = 25(x-2)\\y-50 = 25 x -50\\ y = 25x$

Since the slope is positive, the relationship is proportional.

6 0

2 years ago

If cos f° = four ninths and the measure of segment XW is 16 units, what is the measure of segment XY?

babymother [125]

Answer:

36 units

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test it's right fam :)

4 0

2 years ago

5. Which two triangles in problems 1-4 are similar? Explain. Help please

Shkiper50 [21]

Answer:

Triangle 1(ABC) and Triangle 3(XYZ) are similar since all their angles are equal

In Traingle XYZ m of angle Y is 85 degree..

Hope it helps u...

4 0

1 year ago

The National Transportation Safety Board publishes statistics on the number of automobile crashes that people in various age gro

ra1l [238]

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.12$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.12$

b) $z_{\alpha}=1.64$

c) $z=\frac{0.134 -0.12}{\sqrt{\frac{0.12(1-0.12)}{1000}}}=1.362$

d) $p_v =P(z>1.362)=0.0866$

e) For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=1000 represent the random sample selected

X=134 represent the number of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident

$\hat p=\frac{134}{1000}=0.134$ estimated proportion of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident

$p_o=0.12$ is the value that we want to verify

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic

$p_v{/tex} represent the p valuePart aWe want to verify if the population proportion of young drivers, ages 18 – 24, having accidents is greater than 12%: Null hypothesis:[tex]p\leq 0.12$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.12$

The statistic would be given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

Part b

For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the right and we got:

$z_{\alpha}=1.64$

Part c

For this case the statistic would be given by:

$z=\frac{0.134 -0.12}{\sqrt{\frac{0.12(1-0.12)}{1000}}}=1.362$

Part d

The p value can be calculated with the following probability:

$p_v =P(z>1.362)=0.0866$

Part e

For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12

8 0

2 years ago