Answer:
Total amount at the end of 4 years = $135.16
Explanation:
A simple interest account pays interest on only the sum deposited at an annual rate for a specified period of time without compounding or adding the interest earned in a particular period in the calculation of interest earning for the next period. Thus, if 1000 is invested and interest s earned at 10% then the interest earned will remain constant for every period the money is still deposited in the account.
The formula to calculate interest under simple interest method is,
Interest = Principal * Annual Rate * Time in years
Total Interest earned = 109 * 6% * 4
Total interest earned = 26.16
Total amount at the end of 4 years = Principal + Interest
Total amount at the end of 4 years = 109 + 26.16
Total amount at the end of 4 years = $135.16
Answer:
This was an actual court case that ended in the Court of Appeals of the First District of California. Initially a lower court had ruled against the Sharabianlous and set extremely high compensations for damages to Berenstein. I do not understand why the court did it since it was proven that the land was contaminated and couldn't be sold under unless cleaned.
Finally, the court of appeals ruled in favor of the Sharabianlous, not because they thought they were right, but due to errors in the original trial.
The big issue in this case was that the contract signed by the Sharabianlous wasn't clear enough about what would happen if the land was not suitable for sale and they also failed to seek a lawyer when the contamination issues became obvious. If you read the case, even the real estate broker acted against the Sharabianlous when the property was appraised since he didn't tell the appraiser about the contamination issues.
The final ruling was made in 2010, 8 years after the parties engaged in the transaction, which gives us an idea of how complicated things can get when legal procedures are not followed, even though the outcome should be obvious.
If I was part of a jury and the case was about property that couldn't be sold due to contamination, I would probably vote in favor of the buyer, not the seller. It's common sense, but sometimes it you do not follow the appropriate legal path, common sense makes no sense at all.
Answer:
a<u>.False.</u>
a<u>.True.</u>
Explanation:
It is correct to say that a country with more economic freedom during the last quarter of a century had a higher average GDP per capita than other countries with less freedom, this is due to the fact that the greater the economic freedom, the greater the economic growth of the country, which generates an increase in the country's productive capacity, increases demand, supply, the level of employability, the purchasing power of the population, which, integrated, these factors correspond to the increase in the country's quality of life, which increases the GDP per capita.
Answer:
15. A - Net Loss
Rest of the questions are bad quality, take a better picture.
Explanation:
