A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
Answer: F=6.67 x 10^21
G:6.67 x 10^ -11 N m2/kg2
Answer:
k = -6.29
Step-by-step explanation:
91 - 2 + 7k + 1 = 46
add all like terms
90 + 7k =46
subtract
90 + 7k = 46
-90 -90
------------------------
7k = -44
divide
= 
(these arent fractions thats just how i divide things :))
= -6.28571428571
round to nearest hundredth
k= -6.29
goes up to 9 because 5 makes 8 go up one when rounding
sorry for asking so many questions. hope this helps
Answer:
0
Step-by-step explanation:
pretty easy tbh
Answer:
nickles
Step-by-step explanation:
0.35 x 3= 1.50
so yeah I think so And happy thx giving!
