Answer:
c.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided in the question regarding this situation, it seems that the salesperson engaged in deception by omission. This means that the salesperson told Ronaldo what he wanted to hear in order to close the deal. Even though the salesperson did not lie, he failed to mention an extremely important detail that Ronaldo needed to know in order for the rest of the information provided by the salesperson to hold true. Since the salesperson kept this information to himself in order to close the deal he has deceived Ronaldo.
Answer:
- Division A - $173,710
- Division B - $239,600
Explanation:
First determine the fringe benefits per employee for the whole company;
= 413,310 / 69
= $5,990 per employee
Division A has 29 employees so the fringe benefit cost is;
= 29 * 5,990
= $173,710
Division B has 40 employees so the fringe benefit cost is;
= 40 * 5,990
= $239,600
The answer would be A. Shoes.
It is implied that a good has an inelastic supply if the supplier does not have a choice other than producing it despite the change in production cost. This would as well apply to the buyer, who needs the product no matter the pricing.No one can live without shoes, despite a spike in prices, we still need to buy them.
Answer: Hello below is the complete question
A survey of entrepreneurs focused on their job characteristics, work habits, social activities, leisure time, etc. One question put to each entrepreneur was, "What make of car (U.S., Europe, or Japan) do you drive?" The responses (number in each category) for a sample of 100 entrepreneurs are summarized below. The goal of the analysis is to determine if the proportions of entrepreneurs who drive American, European, and Japanese cars differ.
U.S. Europe Japan
40 35 25
In order to determine whether the true proportions in each response category differ, a one-way chi-square analysis should be conducted. Suppose the p-value for the test was calculated to be p=0.1738 . What is the appropriate conclusion to make when testing at α = 0.10?
Answer : The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Explanation:
Data given:
p-value = 0.1738
α = 0.10
sample size = 100
U.S cars = 40, Europe cars = 35, Japan cars = 25
The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Im not so sure yu should ask somebody thats really good in math sorry i couldnt help