The minimum price that the barber must charge <em>to increase his salary to $4,000</em> for each of the 200 haircuts is <em>A. $25.</em>
Data and Calculations:
Charge per haircut = $20
Total cost per month = $4,000
Monthly salary = $3,000
Other costs per month = $1,000 ($4,000 - $3,000)
Minimum number of haircuts per month = 200
Expected monthly salary per month = $4,000
Total new monthly expenses = $5,000
Minimum price to charge per haircut = $25 ($5,000/200)
Thus, the minimum price that the barber must charge <em>to increase his salary to $4,000</em> without increasing the number of haircuts is $25.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/14872023
Answer:
Ans. The cost of equity capital is 6.5 (6.5%)
Explanation:
Hi, all we need to do is fill the following equation with the data from the problem.
Where:
rf = Risk free rate (in our case, 2%)
MRP = market risk premium (in our case, 6%)
r(e) = Cost of equity capital
Therefore, this is what we get.
So the cost of equity capital is 6.5% or 6.5 as the problem suggests to answer.
Best of luck.
Answer:
1. False
2. Shortage; Larger
Explanation:
1. A binding price ceiling is one that prevents the market from reaching its equilibrium. In this market, the equilibrium price is $25 therefore anything below $25 will be binding. A price ceiling below $25 per box is a binding ceiling.
2<em>. Assuming that the long-run demand for oranges is the same as the short-run demand, you would expect a binding price ceiling to result in a </em><em><u>shortage</u></em><em> that is </em><em><u>larger</u></em><em> in the long run than in the short run.</em>
In the long run, supply is more sensitive because farmers can decide to plant oranges on their land, to plant something else, or to sell their land altogether.
This means that a price ceiling in the long run will be less attractive to farmers so they might leave the market. If they do this then the shortage will be more as there are now less supplies in the market.
Ethics is the branch of philosophy that explores the nature
of moral virtue and evaluates human actions. Philosophical ethics differs from
legal, religious, cultural and personal approaches to ethics by seeking to
conduct the study of morality through a rational, secular outlook that is
grounded in notions of human happiness or well-being. A major advantage of a
philosophical approach to ethics is that it avoids the authoritarian basis of
law and religion as well as the subjectivity, arbitrariness and irrationality
that may characterize cultural or totally personal moral views. (Although some
thinkers differentiate between "ethics," "morals,"
"ethical" and "moral,")