Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Your answer would be B., because you would multiply
2.14 x 22.4 =
47.939
then you will subtract that by 42.9
47.939 - 42.9 =
5.026
Answer:
b. For 100 additional burglaries in California one expects to see an increase of about 3 burglaries in Hawaii.
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope gives the increase in the independent variable per unit increase in the dependent variable. Hence, a reasonable interpretation for the slope would be ;
the rate of change in the number of burglaries in Hawaii per 100 unit change in number of burglaries in California is 3.
Hence, for 100 additional burglaries in California, the rate of change in the number of burglaries in Hawaii is 3.
I'm not sure if that is supposed to be 7 or -7
If it's -7:
1<2n-5<-7
+5 +5 +5 Add 5 to all parts of the inequality get 2n by itself
6<2n<-2
/2 /2 /2 Divide all parts by 2 to isolate the variable
3