Answer:
a. Incremental analysis.
b. Sunk cost.
c. Relevant information.
d. Opportunity cost.
e. Joint products.
f. Out-of-pocket cost.
g. Split-off point.
Explanation:
a. Incremental analysis: examination of differences between costs to be incurred and revenue to be earned under different courses of action.
b. Sunk cost: a cost incurred in the past that cannot be changed as a result of future actions. Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered.
c. Relevant information: costs and revenue that are expected to vary, depending on the course of action decided on. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
d. Opportunity cost: the benefit foregone by not pursuing an alternative course of action. Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
e. Joint products: products made from common raw materials and shared production processes.
f. Out-of-pocket cost: a cost yet to be incurred that will require future payment and may vary among alternative courses of action.
g. Split-off point: the point at which manufacturing costs are split equally between ending inventory and cost of goods sold. Thus, it give rise to joint products that emerge from the same raw materials and a shared manufacturing process.
Answer:
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
Explanation:
It is provided that after cost overruns of the project is $10 million, which can never be recovered, thus, it is a kind of sunk cost.
Sunk cost is the cost which is made previously, and now in no manner will affect the decision, as cannot be recovered.
Therefore, such cost is ignored.
Further provided additional cost will be $12 million, therefore, now the society shall make a rational choice whether to continue the project providing solar electricity of $10 million, as in case of amount of solar energy is $32 million or $22 million, then the choice is obvious to accept,
Rational choice will be for solar electricity worth $10 million.
Therefore, correct statement is
a. continue with the project provided that the additional solar electricity is worth more than $10 million.
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
b- as soon and you have the money ~ so that let's say for example you want a phone and the phone is 300 dollars and you get 15 dollars/ an hour you would save up to get it
Answer: $45,862.29
Explanation:
This question relates to the Present value of an Annuity.
The original price would be the present value of the payments and since the payments are constant over a period, they are an annuity
Interest/ r = 2.25/12 months = 0.1875%
Periods/ n = 4 * 12 months = 48 months
= Payment * (( 1 - ( 1 + r) ^ n)/ r)
= 1,000 * (( 1 - ( 1 + 0.1875%)^48) / 0.1875%)
= $45,862.29