Answer:
C. the benefit drived from the product
Explanation:
Let's suppose that the demand for allergists increases in California. assuming there is a perfectly competitive market for allergists in California :
Allergists from other states (or countries) could move to California.
Surgeons, hematologists, and other doctors in California could become allergists after some retraining.
More people could enter medical school, specialize in allergies, and move to California.
A competitive market is an economic term that refers to a market in which there are a large number of buyers and sellers and no single buyer or seller can influence the market. A competitive market has no barriers to entry, many buyers and sellers, and homogeneous products.
In economics, especially general equilibrium theory, perfect markets, also called atomistic markets, are defined by several idealized conditions collectively known as perfect or atomistic competition.
Learn more about competitive market here: brainly.com/question/8753703
#SPJ4
Answer:
The first part of the question is missing:
"We all learn values from sources such as family, religion, and school. Why might these..."
To be honest, most of the time business decisions are not clean cut ethical or unethical, even if you are not doing anything wrong or illegal. When you are doing business you will try to make the largest possible profit and money doesn't just appear from no where, if you earn money, you will be taking it away from someone else. In the best case scenario, you will be giving that customer a higher perceived value than the cost of your product or service, so everyone wins.
But many times, not everyone wins. E.g. you manage a construction company and you will bid for a project, hopefully you will win and make money, but others will lose. Empathy is good for marketing, but very bad for finances.
When thousands of jobs are replaced not by Chinese workers, but instead by computers and robots, it's just bad luck for the unemployed. When large stores like Sears go bankrupt while Amazon surges, good for Amazon, bad for Sears.
Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.